Even though there could be difficult consequences associated with adultery, we should not worry about how other people would feel.
The only reason they would not pursue the action would be because they are afraid of the ramifications. Kantian Ethics has impartiality and equality at its heart and it appeals to Reason for its foundations rather than religion or other sources such as governments and personal emotions.
However, if when weighing out our decisions we come to the conclusion that committing adultery could be risky and possibly ruin ones life, then I feel Rand may argue that we would better benefit ourselves by not cheating on ones spouse.
Perfect duties are obligatory and must be obeyed by all people; they are generally negative because they consist in not harming other people, or indeed, in not harming oneself Kant was against suicide. As far as they are concerned it is simply a form of the death penalty being used on those who have committed a seriously wrong act, dishonouring the family that gave them life in the first place.
This theory is illustrated through the story of Prometheus. I agree with Ayn Rand in that we should be selfish, at least some of the time. Finally, the only way I think adultery could be possibly justified in the eyes of Mill would be through act utilitarianism.
Perfect and Imperfect Duties According to Kant the Categorical Imperative leads to two kinds of duty, perfect duties and imperfect duties.
Another interpretation is that an action is acceptable depending on whether you think anyone could perform it in a particular situation; this opens up the door to a more relative approach to morality, but then it Kant adultery difficult to know where to stop.
However, adultery can quite easily have the opposite effect. By insisting that we never use other people as a means to an end Kant is ensuring that numerous harmful practices are prohibited, such as stealing from other people, rape, making false promises, and slavery. Imagine a shopkeeper who is fair and honest in his dealings Kant adultery always gives his customers the right change, but only does this because he thinks it is the best way to operate his business for his own profit, after all, if he gets a reputation for dodgy dealing then his profits will suffer.
This is a negative test because it only shows us what is immoral and ought not to be done. Kant specifically endorsed this interpretation of the Categorical Imperative, and gave the following examples: When analyzing the Hedonistic Calculus, I feel Mill would argue that this specific summation of factors is only seen from the point of view of the adulterer.
However, adultery can quite easily have the opposite effect. By insisting that we never use other people as a means to an end Kant is ensuring that numerous harmful practices are prohibited, such as stealing from other people, rape, making false promises, and slavery.
A third interpretation, similar to the last, runs like this: Upon becoming aware of this, the Gods were angered and Prometheus was tortured for the rest of eternity. There is a lot of merit to this approach, for example, we might say that duties of justice often outrank those of fidelity, for example if you have promised to keep a secret for a friend and it turns out that they are involved in a murder case and the information you have been told is a vital piece of evidence, then you should break the promise and tell the police what you know.
Prometheus stole fire from the Gods and shared it with fellow mankind. If I have an opportunity to improve my own situation, or to improve that of another person, then which is to take priority?
In conclusion, while I believe that adultery can be considered moral if the adulterer knows they will not be caught, I believe there is no way to be certain of this, and therefore the pursuit of adultery is always unethical. If his only motive is profit, and he sees a chance to make a profit by defrauding a customer, then surely he would do it?
He believes there are two types of motives behind actions; external and internal.
It does not matter how many times they cheat; as long as they do not harm anyone else in the process, I believe that adultery can be viewed as ethical. But life is more complicated than that. If keeping a promise will mean that someone will get hurt then should I keep the promise or not?
Kant believes that as rational agents we are all equal because we all have our own minds, thoughts, and goals in life. As threats to autonomy and ethical behavior go, Jennifer is more at risk, since she has allowed temptation to alter her decision-making, while Bob only allowed temptation to override his when he makes his final choice.
Whilst this would give people rights and protection from abuse, this may also be impractical and prevent the achievement of social goals.
I feel that it can be a morally justified action if there is no chance to be caught.
Indeed, it may be that in order to rank the duties we will start having to think about the consequences, and if we do this then we are departing from a deontological perspective.Adultery is wrong—most of the time. (Maybe that's not such a reassurance.) The chief proponent of deontology is Immanuel Kant (), whose seminal work in ethics is his book.
Aug 02, · Let’s consider Immanuel Kant and his concept of the Categorical Imperative. Taking the risk of simplifying the concept too much, one corollary of it would be: Don’t behave in an activity that if everyone behaved in the same way it would make the activity impossible.
In his book, Flaubert reflected relationships, adultery, hypocrisy and many other aspects of his time with his realistic characters.
This paper is designed to analyse those main characters of the book, function of the community in the book, Emma’s adultery and reactions against it, Emma’s suicide, her. Kant Adultery Project in Health Social Problems: Adultery Patrick James Narvasa Rhianna Mantos ADULTERY I.
History Marital infidelity is a violation or breach of good faith and confidence by one or both spouses to the matrimonial vows. Kant thought of good will as being a willingness to do your duty, come what may.
Kant argued that you should perform a moral action because it was the right thing to do, and out of a sense duty, not for any non-moral reason such as to please God, avoid punishment, or receive money.
In his book, Flaubert reflected relationships, adultery, hypocrisy and many other aspects of his time with his realistic characters. This paper is designed to analyse those main characters of the book, function of the community in the book, Emma’s adultery and reactions against it, Emma’s suicide, her.Download